linerside.blogg.se

1. #Ethernet status says i have 1gbps. only getting 1.8 uverse full
2. #Ethernet status says i have 1gbps. only getting 1.8 uverse download

And the whole device power consumption will be drawn from the source with highest voltage (48V). The diode on input will block power from escaping through ports with lower voltage (the 24V one). So if you use two power sources, one say 24V and another one say 48V, then the common point of both power lines will have voltage of the highest source (48V). The way other RB devices with multiple power source options work (and I don't see any reason for RB5009 to behave differently) is that they use a simple diode on each power input (to block power flowing out) and then all the sources are connected together. In this scenario, one power source is "active" power and other stay just "standby" ready for "fail over"? What will be the primary? I can safely plug my RB5009 connected to both DC jack input and POE on ETH1? It should negotiate 2.5G, and wonder if it make it faster.Īctually I was wondering how exactly the "multiple power source" works.

#Ethernet status says i have 1gbps. only getting 1.8 uverse full

Now, disable it again and add 2.5G full in Advertise. I'm hoping 元 offload is coming soon.ĭisable interface. Given this router is still really new, I'm optimistic that future fw will improve performance and make it even better/consistent experience. Regardless of these results I still very much like the RB5009, it's got much more horsepower and performance feels snappier. When running speed tests I noticed CPU was 60-80% with 2.5G advertising included, where as without I'm seeing 10-16%.įYI, I recently migrated from Edgerouter POE5, where I was consistently getting 800-900+ Mb/s. Prior to discovering your post, I experimented with numerous other tweaks without much difference in results, from adding/removing fastrack to adjusting firewall rules. +1, seeing very similar results, see below. If it advertise as 1G then speed is OK, but when advetising 2.5G, speed is below 800MBits when connected to other 2.5G nic (tested with QNAP PCI and usb 2.5G). I have a very similar problem, but in my scenario, I have 4 VLAN's and I'm using 2.5G port as an access port for LAN. I didn't want to use an SFP+ module until I had a much faster Internet service speed available in my area. One of the reasons I opted for the RB5009 is the 2.5G WAN port. Basically a factory reset configuration with a fast-track firewall setting. There are no other switches, routers, or devices in the chain. Bypassing the RB5009 and connecting directly to the ISP modem yields a fairly consistent 850Mb/s. CPU load runs about 1 to 10% in all scenarios. If I remove advertising 2.5G and only advertise 1.0G full duplex, the transfer rate increases to 650 to 850 Mb/s. When the RB5009 ether1 WAN port is "advertising" 2.5G full duplex and is connected to a 2.5G ISP modem with gigabit speed service, the data transfer speed drops by about half to 300 to 400 Mb/s.

#Ethernet status says i have 1gbps. only getting 1.8 uverse download

I have encountered a download speed performance issue that is easy to duplicate. I just migrated to a new RB5009UG+S+ from an RB3011.